Can someone explain to me the difference between the prognosis of the types of planning agreement sharing (FRC) and the just-in-time (JIT). The system uses two types of sharing in the sales provider agreement: ` Rejection of the head and item level of the sales schedule agreement in the sale planning application > reason for refusal. Unlocking the Sales Delivery Plan and New Processing The system uses the following search criteria to search for a sales delivery plan: The DS-type provision for E JIT delivery plans is not used in the sale agreement New delivery plans established for the same party related to the sale, but which have not removed or rejected the old sales contract. System Response: The system stops processing the EDI message As a message sender, check the classification in the purchase delivery plan. To recreate old divisions that are not copied, run it manually. The debtor reference in the sale delivery agreement does not correspond to the order number. The sale delivery plan is a framework agreement between the buyer and the supplier. JIT delivery forecasts and plans are sent by EDI. These delivery plans include delivery dates and quantities. The entire communication is based on cumulative quantities between the buyer and the supplier. None of the existing delivery plans meet the search criteria. If the system finds multiple sales delivery plans, this may be the case for the following reasons: If the reprocessing fails, contact business users and ask them to establish a new sales delivery plan.
This service allows the following operations for delivery plans delivery plans: The system has blocked the sales delivery plan, now a new incoming SOAP API is made available for API Hub. This asynchronous process allows you to automatically receive and update delivery plans as a supplier with SAP S/4HANA Cloud. It is based on the SOAP protocol with namespace-sap.com/xi/EDI/Supplier. . Choose another delivery plan in the previous delivery plan number. The system found that you delivered materials back of the calendar according to the expected cumulative amount provided by the Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) message. Please fill out this form, we will try to respond as soon as possible. Please copy this integration script and insert it where you want to integrate it. I created both types of publications and I saw no difference between them. The output was exactly the same, although each uses a different type of output. If I get exactly the same document for both types, why do we need two different types? It seems to me that they behave in exactly the same way.
. I think I understand the purpose – FRC is to allow the seller to plan the quantities that need to be delivered, and JIT is a requirement for a particular amount of material for a given date, and probably also time. . Planning plans can be generated to flatten the needs passed on to the production. The sold part that arrives with the EDI message or is identified in the “Sold Assignments” app. Manually change the customer reference that was placed with the corresponding order number in the “Change the Sales Planning Agreement” app. Update planning lines with revised quantities and dates – Customer hardware, partner description, and unloading point (if any) that are linked to the EDI message. The shipping specialist establishes deliveries based on bulk quantities in the delivery monitor. The system only processes the EDI message if the first delivery plan is the delivery plan in place The system could not identify the type of text, as no record was indicated for EDI_V_TXTIN_SUP After the system processed the planning schedule, the JIT delivery plan was manually re-processed General System Message stating that the processing failed due to a problem, dial another sharing number from the previous output number, change the change sales planning application > Select Item > Fore.Dl >.